flatpak, KDE PIM, sandboxing and akonadi data

[Daniel Vrátil]

On Wednesday, 3 July 2019 10:40:25 CEST René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Hi,

Hi

> 
> Does anyone know if the PIM apps installed and run through flatpak use the
> same akonadi data as the apps installed and run "normally" (from
> /usr[/local]/bin etc)?

They don't.

> 
> In other words, could one use the flatpak version (from flathub, to be
> exact) to test-drive a different version without risking your main Akonadi
> data?

Yes, the Flatpak'ed Akonadi stores data, database and configuration completely 
separately from the non-sandboxed Akonadi.

> 
> Would this use the same session DBus or does the flatpak sandboxing come
> with its own (IOW, would you have to stop the main akonadi/PIM runtime)?

Yes, you have to stop the main Akonadi and PIM apps before running the 
Flatpak'ed one due to DBus name conflicts - unfortunately when I first created 
the Flatpak it did not occur to me the DBus names are going to leak outside of 
the Flatpak, so I did not use namespacing for the Flatpak - and there's no 
easy way to "migrate" into a namespace now.

 -Dan

> 
> Thanks,
> R.


-- 
Daniel Vrátil
www.dvratil.cz | dvratil at kde.org
IRC: dvratil on Freenode (#kde, #kontact, #akonadi, #fedora-kde)

GPG Key: 0x4D69557AECB13683
Fingerprint: 0ABD FA55 A4E6 BEA9 9A83 EA97 4D69 557A ECB1 3683
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdepim-users/attachments/20190704/93cb68c4/attachment.sig>