[kdepim-users] Why is akonadictl fsck less fussy than kmail?

[David Goodenough]

I realise that, being a Debian user and therefore running 4.11.5, I am not
running the quite the latest KdePim, but I am plagued by duplicate entries 
from both POP and IMAP servers, and also resource not found, NO No item
found and Collection error messages, along for the IMAP server with unable
to get UID for new message messages.  So most of my folders can not be 
de-duplicated, and the whole system is getting slower and slower as the 
indexes grow with all the duplicates that can not be removed.

So I when I discovered that akonadictl has an fsck option, I thought great - 
maybe I can get rid of some of these errors.  But it would appear that either
fsck is supposed to do something entirely different to what I would expect,
or it is simply less fussy that kmail - and therefore not a useful tool
to fix my system.

I have heard that 4.12 contains lots of fixes, so maybe I should just wait
until the debian kdepim packagers get around to it.  Are these fixes likely
to address these problems?

David

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users