[kdepim-users] Yet Another Troubled KMail2 Migration Successful (Maybe) (For Now)

O. Sinclair o.sinclair at gmail.com
Tue Jul 9 20:21:02 BST 2013


On 09/07/2013 20:53, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 9. Juli 2013, 13:29:32 schrieb O. Sinclair:
>> On 08/07/2013 16:20, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>>> Am Montag, 8. Juli 2013, 12:46:34 schrieb O. Sinclair:
>>>> On 08/07/2013 09:59, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>>>>> Am Sonntag, 7. Juli 2013, 21:06:17 schrieb O. Sinclair:
>>>>>> I have not lost 1 mail yet in 4 (or more) years and have mail storage
>>>>>> since 2000 in my accounts. With KDEPIM1 and recent versions. My
>>>>>> frustration has always been with the mail address scenario and search -
>>>>>> and at 4.10.x it works too.
>>>>>
>>>>> I had mail loss. But only under very specific circumstances, i.e. using
>>>>> CRM 114 spam filter rules, which pipe a mail through an external
>>>>> command.
>>>>>
>>>>> Without these rules, which worked just fine with KMail 1, I have not
>>>>> seen
>>>>> any data loss either.
>>>>
>>>> In this case I would blame CRM114 64-bit that had (has?) known issues at
>>>> least in Kubuntu. I also use CRM114 combined with Spambayes and the
>>>> times filters really misbehaved was with CRM114 after I migrated to
>>>> 64-bit
>>>
>>> Do you have more details on that?
>>>
>>> I used CRM114 with KMail 1 on the very same 64-bit box for almost a year
>>> ago and never missed a single mail.
>>
>> I am afraid it is one of those "I searched the internet and found mail
>> or info that seemed to verify that 64-bit CRM114 has issues" but have
>> not saved where and/or when I did so.
>>
>> point though is that currently I use both CRM114 and Spambayes and it
>> seems to work fine, distro being Kubuntu 12.10 64-bit and KDE 4.10.4
>
> Please share the *exact* filter rules so I can see whats different with mine.
>
> I happily close related bug report if it turns out to be a mistake in my filter
> rules. I put the filter rules online in bug report. I did not spot anything
> obvious that would explain that data loss for me.
>
> [Akonadi] [Bug 319226] New: produces 1-byte-sized files on failed move attempts
> while filtering
>
> Or do you use IMAP and have integrated it with server?
>
> Thank you,
>
see earlier reply about never touching the "advanced" tab so both my 
crm114 and my spambayes work on all accounts by default.

the crm114 and the spambayes are as they were created by the wizard. The 
difference is that I combine the 2 in the spam handling and spam 
classification filters -but all I do is to combine the original ones to 
e.g "match any of the following" "X-CRM114-STATUS contains SPAM" and 
"spambayes-classification contains spam". And similarly with the other 
related filters (semi-spam unsure, classify as spam, classify as not spam).




_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users



More information about the kdepim-users mailing list