[kdepim-users] unconfirmed bugs

Ingo Klöcker kloecker at kde.org
Mon Mar 22 19:58:20 GMT 2010

On Monday 22 March 2010, Dj YB wrote:
> hello,
> there are some bugs I have reported and most of them are still
> unconfirmed, does it mean that no one else have that problem?
> how a bug becomes confirmed?

If it is confirmed by a bug triager or somebody else with the necessary 
permissions. The bugs might also be auto-confirmed if the number of 
votes reaches a certain number, but I'm not sure whether this feature is 

> does it matter what the status is?

I don't know. When I still fixed bugs it didn't matter.

> the bugs are:
> 26/10/2009
> moving all recurring event to different day of week not working
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211972
> 19/10/2009
> month view event paste bug
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211125
> 02/03/2010
> open in addressbook, not presented
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=229085
> if no one can reproduce those bugs then what should I do?

Not sure. If you can still reproduce them with the latest stable version 
then add another comment. Ohh, I see you already did this. That's very 
good. Most bug reporters never report whether their bugs still occur in 
later version.

You might also want to ask on forums or whereever whether others can 
reproduce those bugs. Maybe some readers of this list will confirm the 
bugs (in the sense that they add a comment to those bug reports).

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdepim-users/attachments/20100322/12af43ff/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
KDE PIM users mailing list
kdepim-users at kde.org

More information about the kdepim-users mailing list