[Kdepim-bugs] Moderation

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Tuesday 16 January 2007 17:48, Volker Krause wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 16, 2007 04:14:57 PM Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> > The downside of the -bugs list is right now that it is moderated,
> > so new bugs do not get reported all that quickly (until a moderator
> > takes a look at them). Ideas?

The kdepim-bugs mailing list should not be moderated. I thought one 
reason for having a special mailing list just for receiving bug reports 
was that we can enable moderation for all other KDE PIM mailing lists 
(like kmail-devel which currently is not moderated).

And while you are at it please remove the [Kdepim-bugs] subject prefix.

> Moderating this list is IMHO a very bad idea given the amount of bug
> mails we get every day. We don't do that on the other lists, right?
> Are there any specific reasons to do it here?

Actually all KDE lists that can be moderated are moderated. This is done 
to prevent those spam messages not caught by the spam filters to get 
through to the lists. Obviously, mailing lists receiving bug reports 
can't be moderated.

Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdepim-bugs/attachments/20070116/077ef73a/attachment.sig>