[Kdenlive-devel] [Mlt-devel] different videostab filter
Marco Gittler
marco at gitma.de
Tue Sep 20 14:22:49 UTC 2011
Hi
Am 19.09.2011 um 20:20 schrieb Dan Dennedy:
> Hi all,
> Just read that YouTube is adding video stabilization using this technique:
>
> http://research.google.com/pubs/pub37041.html
looks also very nice the result. I hope we could get some code for this soon.
>
The 2nd videostab is now ready to test an merge.
As i saw, both videostab's need to use non interlaced video, else it will not work correct.
I hope nothing is missing now, to merge.
regards marco
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Dan Dennedy <dan at dennedy.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Marco Gittler <marco at gitma.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 11.09.2011 um 01:29 schrieb Dan Dennedy:
>>>
>>>> 2011/9/2 Marco Gittler <marco at gitma.de>:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> i integrated a second (very nice) videostab from http://public.hronopik.de/vid.stab/features.php?lang=en
>>>>> which seems to be make a bit better job. (https://github.com/gmarco/mlt/commits/videostab)
>>>>>
>>>>> This video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRA5H1LYzM4&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
>>>>> is very shaky and using the filter videostab, the result has still some rolling in the video. Also it has some more "stretch areas" in den borders.
>>>>>
>>>>> The videostab2 filter seems to use a complete different algo.
>>>>> -It has much more parameter to be adjusted (not implemented yet)
>>>>> -is can handle yuv and rgb data (rgb is _much_ slower tha yuv , yuv nearly as fast as videostab filter )
>>>>> -is can remove the rolling of the camera much better
>>>>> -it will zoom in to avoid the "stretch borders"
>>>>>
>>>>> This is only a Test version. But i think, it would be worth to have this too in mlt (a bit work is to make it full working (parameters/debug log) )
>>>>>
>>>>> Usage of the filter is equal to videostab.
>>>>
>>>> You must address the following problems before I will merge it into MLT.
>>>>
>>>> 1) Why did you revert my change to uncomment the values.h include in
>>>> stab/estimate.c? It is needed to get MAXFLOAT; otherwise, it fails to
>>>> build for me. If you need to comment it out to make it build, then
>>>> provide a universal fix.
>>> This was needed because it did not compile on mac. (filter_videostab.c also)
>>>>
>>>> 2) Makefile includes flags -mmmx -msse -msse2. We cannot just
>>>> arbitrarily add these flags without respecting the configure --disable
>>>> options, and there is no reason to add them only for videostab and no
>>>> other code. Just remove them. Also, make gives 'cc1: error:
>>>> unrecognized command line option "-fasm-blocks"'
>>> Tt is not ready to merge now, it is only a quick an dirty test of the algo itself, to see first results.
>>
>> OK, you can see I am eager to merge it. :-) I did not have a chance
>> yet to actually use it.
>>
>>> Makefile must be changed to respect these settings later.
>>
>> I prefer them not included at all and just let packagers add
>> optimizations (if they are feeling brave).
>>
>>>> 3) Why do you always ignore the mlt coding conventions in all of the
>>>> code that you personally contribute? I am not talking about other
>>>> peoples' code files that you copy in - that should retain original
>>>> formatting. For example, in filter_videostab2.c, right in the middle
>>>> of the code I wrote consistent with the conventions, you put things
>>>> like
>>>> if (dat && dat->data){
>>>> and
>>>> (*format==mlt_image_rgb24?0:1)
>>>
>>> This is only a first quick test. i had problems with framesize of yuv420 data.
>>> The size*3/2 seems to be to small and cause segfault (must be investigated)
>>>>
>>>> 4) Remove the commented code that obviously no longer belongs.
>>>
>>> This should be all done if the rest works fully.
>>>>
>>>> 5) There is no filter_videostab2.yml.
>>>>
>>>> 6) This is optional, but I think you should set the interpolation
>>>> (TransformData.interpoltype) based on the frame property
>>>> "rescale.interp" See
>>>> src/modules/avformat/filter_swscale.c:filter_scale() how to interpret
>>>> that property. By default, the SDL consumers use low quality "nearest"
>>>> and avformat uses higher quality "bilinear."
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is a good hint. i will try to change these things later (after vacation )
>>
>> take your time
>>
>>>> 7) In filter_videostab2_init(), you allocate StabData, but so does
>>>> stabilize_init() later in the function. I suggest just remove the call
>>>> the stabilize_init().
>>>
>>> there must be al lot of code cleanup, since i was working on get the videostab2 code to work with mlt.
>>>>
>>>> 8) In filter_get_image(), you allocate TransformData with
>>>> mlt_pool_alloc() but tell the property to destroy it with
>>>> mlt_properties_close - should mlt_pool_release.
>>>
>>> Thanks, will be changed also when i'm working on it.
>>>>
>>>> 9) There is a printf() in filter_get_image().
>>>
>>> This will be changed into mlt_log… also.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The whole code is still in testing stage and should me an others give a first look.
>>> After that look if found, that it would be a bit better code to stabilize the video.
>>> After resolving the last issues and change the code to have full mlt coding conversions, we could merge this later, but not this time.
>>>
>>> But very kind of you to find out some fundamental things that must be changed to.
>>> I will try to change most of this in 1-2 week(s).
>>> I hope it is also for others to see, that this code coudl be usefull.
>>
>> I will take some moment to actually use it and give some feedback
>> about how it compares to first videostab for me.
>>
>> --
>> +-DRD-+
>>
>
>
>
> --
> +-DRD-+
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3721 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20110920/676ef347/attachment.p7s>
More information about the Kdenlive
mailing list