[Kdenlive-devel] Introduction

[Dan Dennedy]

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Dan Dennedy<dan at dennedy.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:12 AM, jb <jb at kdenlive.org> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 03 June 2009 09:06:59 Dan Dennedy wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Oceanwatcher <video at datahverdag.com> wrote:
>>
>>> As we discussed in the forum, and I as mentioned here previously, I do
>>> think we need to cleanup the names of the transitions. Let's put aside
>>> the issue with the Composite transition for the moment. I am thinking
>>> namely about "Luma" and "Wipe." I had proposed a new one named
>>> "Dissolve" that would become the default - basically a featureless
>>> version of today's Luma. Then, I think Wipe should be called Slide
>>> (please confirm). Finally, what is currently Luma would be called
>>> Wipe. Do you agree? JB, are you ok with this?
>>
>> Yes, I agree that "Luma" is really not an explicit name. I am ok with the proposes name change.
>>
>
> Then, I volunteer to make the changes. I shall not forget to change
> Get Hot New Stuff, but I will need someone else to change the web site
> to match afterwards.
>

These changes are committed! However, I have not fixed the case where
Slide requires the outgoing clip to be on a higher track (lower
number). Hmm, notice how I have to clarify the meaning of "higher
track." I used to think the track numbering is not so important, but
perhaps it is for the sake of communication.

+-DRD-+