[Kdenlive-devel] capturing

[Rolf Dubitzky]

What's your timescale on the VEML changes. The problem is, I want to fix these 
ALSA problems, but the commits are somewhat in conflict with the VEML syntax 
chnges. I would need to do same CVS gymnastics or create a new branch to have 
both. However, if kdenlive can talk the new VEML, than we could have a 0.2.5 
synched release for both projects. 

Cheers, Rolf


On Monday 22 March 2004 20:50, Jason Wood wrote:
> On Monday 22 March 2004 19:06, Rolf Dubitzky wrote:
> > On Monday 22 March 2004 17:07, Jason Wood wrote:
> > > The only difference I would suggest is to remove the
> > > <captureGetDevices> command and add the information of the return
> > > message to the
> > > <getCapabilities> reply that already get's sent. (you can add this now;
> > > it will not affect kdenlive).
> >
> > Hmm.. but getCapabilities is something you just need to do once (unless
> > you install new plugins)captureGetDevices is something you might want to
> > do more often to poll for new attached devices.
>
> Good point, I had not thought of that.
>
> > > If you add the capture commands, you might be able to test them out
> > > using the new "send veml command" box in the debug dialog before the ui
> > > is complete.
> >
> > Ah, that's very cool I actually wanted to write something like that for
> > piave to test stuff.
>
> My last post saying I had finished committing everything was a little
> lie... I have definitely finished committing everything now.
>
> Cheers,
> Jason

-- 
contacts: http://www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de/~dubitzky