[Kdenlive-devel] XML representation for effects.
Jason Wood
jasonwood at blueyonder.co.uk
Tue Feb 24 04:36:50 UTC 2004
Hi people,
Ok, I still haven't got sufficient internet access to release 0.2.4, but I am
continuing on with the implementation of effects.
My first aim is to get a simple effect (as opposed to a transition) working -
the effect I had in mind was the invert filter effect, which shows up in
Kdenlive, and if not already fully implemented in piave is presumably quite
simple to implement.
I have a had a brief look in piave about effects and am a little confused as
to what the current VEML format is :-) I think that we have let the spec
slip, and before I go any further I want to get an updated version down on
paper (and the web).
What I last remember us having looks very much like the textmaster example in
the piave examples folder :
<veml>
<scenelist>
<scene duration="2" >
<effect tracks="1">
<inputs>
<input file="../samples/4x3-PAL.dv" inpoint="0" />
</inputs>
<video effect="textmaster" inpoint="0.5" outpoint="1.5">
<dtext>Some test AV ??</dtext>
<font>
/mnt/winxp/windows/Fonts/spacetoa.ttf
</font>
<size>
<keyframe time="0.0">0.06</keyframe>
<keyframe time="1.0">0.02</keyframe>
<keyframe time="2.0">0.1</keyframe>
</size>
<position>
<keyframe time="0.0" x="0.0" y="0.1" width="0.8" height="0.2" />
<keyframe time="1.0" x="0.1" y="0.1" width="0.8" height="0.2" />
<keyframe time="2.0" x="0.3" y="0.6" width="0.8" height="0.2" />
</position>
</video>
</effect>
</scene>
</scenelist>
</veml>
Here, a member of the <inputs> directory could be a video (as above), or it
could be another effect - to allow you to "stack" effects with each other.
We last discussed this a long time ago, and since then we decided to try and
be smil-like in our syntax. I need to read up on SMIL again so I can get a
better idea of exactly what I need, but here's a chance for people to get the
ball rolling. What should the XML for a simple color inversion filter look
like?
Following the textmaster example, it might be something like this (removing
the veml and scenelist tags for brevity):
<scene duration="2" >
<effect tracks="1">
<inputs>
<input file="../samples/4x3-PAL.dv" inpoint="0" />
</inputs>
<video effect="invertfilter"/>
</effect>
</scene>
Making it more smil-like with my current limited view would look something
like this (told you I need to read up some more :-)
<seq>
<effect>
<inputs>
<video src="../samples/4x3-PAL.dv" clipBegin="0" clipEnd="2"/>
</inputs>
<!-- This video tag can contain properties and keyframes for the effect,
however the invertfilter does not have any. -->
<video effect="invertfilter"/>
</effect>
</seq>
I have not convinced myself that the above syntax is the best, what do other
people think?
Cheers,
Jason
p.s. I am prepared to take on both sides of the implementation of the VEML
interface for this, until I get a permanent internet connection again I am
not going to be able to do a cvs update/commit :-(
--
Jason Wood
Homepage : www.uchian.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
More information about the Kdenlive
mailing list