reshuffling in bugzilla

George Goldberg grundleborg at googlemail.com
Thu Nov 8 07:42:12 CET 2007


On Nov 3, 2007 5:19 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen <ossi at kde.org> wrote:
> moin,
>
> i have been looking through the product/component definitions and came
> to these conclusions:
>
> - some initial owners need to be changed:
>   - kstyle => fredrikh? (gallium (kszwed) left)
>   - klocale => chusslove? (seems to be more active in this area than
>     coolo in recent times)
>   - kdesasl => kdelibs-bugs? (michael left. this component has one bug
>     open)
>   - somebody feels like stealing/giving away duty? :)
> - there are both libkdegames/general and kdelibs/libkdegames. i tend to
>   favor the former and move bugs and maintainer of the latter there.
> - we need some serious triaging - closing obsolete bugs and reassigning
>   owners - 1000 bugs are waiting ...

I have been hacking away at this for a couple of weeks now, but making
very slow progress, especially since I am no expert...

Am using this techbase page, since I don't have ability to close bugs
etc on bugzilla.

http://techbase.kde.org/Contribute/Bugsquad/Bugs_to_be_done

Any advice about what counts as obselete would be very appreciated...
Also, what is the situation with arts? Is it still alive for bug fixes
or is it completely dead?

>   maybe coordinate via #kdelibs-bugs? dunno.
>   btw, we should do this before tagging the devel platform as a real
>   release candidate. ;)
>
> --
> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
> --
> Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
> _______________________________________________
> Kdelibs-bugs mailing list
> Kdelibs-bugs at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdelibs-bugs
>


More information about the Kdelibs-bugs mailing list