D18354: Simplify notification handling
Albert Vaca Cintora
noreply at phabricator.kde.org
Mon Jan 21 15:42:55 GMT 2019
albertvaka accepted this revision.
albertvaka added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM, just two comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> notificationsmodel.cpp:271-272
> {
> - //TODO only emit the affected indices
> - Q_UNUSED(id);
> Q_EMIT dataChanged(index(0,0), index(m_notificationList.size() - 1, 0));
I would keep the parameter and the TODO, or fix the dataChanged emit so it doesn't contain every row.
> notification.h:74
> void replyRequested();
> - void ready();
> + Q_SCRIPTABLE void ready();
>
Why Q_SCRIPTABLE?
REPOSITORY
R224 KDE Connect
BRANCH
noti
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D18354
To: nicolasfella, #kde_connect, broulik, albertvaka
Cc: albertvaka, kdeconnect, vporvaznik, mschroeder, varunp, shivanshukantprasad, skymoore, brute4s99, wistak, anoopv, dvalencia, rmenezes, julioc, Leptopoda, timothyc, Danial0_0, johnq, Pitel, adeen-s, SemperPeritus, daniel.z.tg, jeanv, seebauer, bugzy, MayeulC, lemuel, menasshock, mikesomov, tctara, apol
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdeconnect/attachments/20190121/f1086935/attachment.html>
More information about the KDEConnect
mailing list