Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?

[René J.V. Bertin]

On Monday October 12 2020 11:21:43 Stakanov wrote:

>So we do agree that KMAIL 3 was at the time a lightweight, fast and functional 
>MTA. 

I've never used it, but still have this idea of testing a Trinity DE one day.

> Just to be clear, I am using MySQL (mariadb) backend. KMail2 works just fine
> with that.

FWIW, me too, but with KMail 4.14.x . It does get wonky from time to time, but I'm pretty certain that is not because of the DB backend choice.


R