KDE's rough edges... what are your experiences?
Duncan
1i5t5.duncan at cox.net
Tue Oct 29 14:43:49 GMT 2013
Frank Steinmetzger posted on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:36:02 +0100 as excerpted:
> But from a convenience standpoint, KDE beats them all with nice extra
> features (KIO, global keyboard shortcuts, range of consistent
> base-applications). And even though I have some issues with it now and
> then (like reliable and *easy*
> file transfer via Bluetooth), I come back to KDE every time, despite it
> taking 20 hours to compile on an Atom. ^^
FWIW, I run an old first-gen 32-bit-only atom netbook here too. But I
couldn't tell you how long kde or anything else takes to build on it,
because I have a 32-bit build-image chroot on my main 6-core Athlon fx
with 16 gigs RAM and dual SSDs in btrfs raid1 mode. That's where I do
all my atom/netbook targeted update builds, then rsync them across to the
netbook. Tho I only actually update the netbook every year or longer...
it's still running kde 4.6, IIRC, and I really should update it again,
one of these days...
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
More information about the kde
mailing list