Nepomuk/Strigi filled my disk

[Martin (KDE)]

Anne Wilson schrieb:
> On Thursday 05 March 2009 08:25:38 Martin (KDE) wrote:
>   
>> Hallo Anne
>>
>> strigi writes its database to ~/.strigi (afaik). 
>>     
>
> I don't have that directory at all.  
>
>   
>> As I have disabled
>> strigi (my home directory is on a nfs server and indexing via network is
>> damn slow and makes my network almost unusable) I currently can not check.
>>
>>     
> I found the same, until I found that nicing it to 19 made it work 'nicely' in 
> the background.
>   

It is not much a problem of the cpu performance. strigi/nepomuk database 
has several hundred of megabytes and transfer over a 100MBit network 
takes some minutes (as my home directory is on the server via network - 
so is the strigi/nepomuk database). Strigi and similar may be good for 
single host (even connected via network) but in its current 
configuration it is bad for a full networked installation as diskless or 
semi-diskless systems. In the future we need a distributed strigi or 
similar.

Martin
> Anne
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ___________________________________________________
> This message is from the kde mailing list.
> Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
> Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
> More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.