Amarok need Ruby??

[Boyan Tabakov]

On 18.12.2006 12:04, Rashid N. Achilov wrote:
> Is it Windows, that I should have a big pile of completely useless
> software? I prefer know, what reason is to have at my HDD some files. I
> prefer install only software, which I really need. Probably, Ruby will use
> for one-two plugins, which I'll never use - why I should have "some one"
> useless package?

If you are so upset with installing ruby, don't. You can force installing 
amarok without meeting the requirements. I don't know however, why the big 
fuss. There are probably quite many other packages installed on your system 
for similar reasons, and you don't seem to complain about those.

Even if amarok doesn't need ruby, but only the scripts do, it is a requirement 
as long as the scripts come packed within amarok's package.

-- 
Blade hails you...

From cradle to coffin
Shall my wickedness be your passion
                        --Nightwish
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20061218/50d3e62d/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.