Why GTK+ will prevail, and what needs to be done

[Kevin Krammer]

On Saturday 29 January 2005 10:11, andrew kar wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 20:45 -0500, Taylor Byrnes wrote:
> > I hope you all have enjoyed reading my explanation, I'd love to hear
> > some thoughts.
>
> Actually I just had another thought on this; Isn't Gtk just a C toolkit
> and not an OO C++ kit like qt?

GTK+ is written in C, that's its main API, but nevertheless it is OO.
They needs some extra functions and macros to add do it as the language itself 
doesn't provide OO features, but their language bindings use the respective 
languages OO features when possible.

Cheers,
Kevin
-- 
Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer at gmx.at>
Qt/KDE Developer, Debian User
www.mrunix.de - German Unix/Linux programming forum
www.qtforum.org - Qt programming forum
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.