Where to report sites that render bad in konqueror?

[Kevin Krammer]

On Wednesday 02 June 2004 14:28, kde at schertell.com wrote:
> >they are saying that they don't want Konqueror (and probably
> > Apple Safari) users as their customers!
>
> This is the part I can't figure out!  If the Safari/Konqueror relationship
> is supposed to be mutually beneficial to KHTML, how come so many websites
> are broken in Konqueror and work fine in Safari?

It needs time to merge the patches sent by the safari developers back into 
KHTMLs main source.
You can read the archives of kfm-devel if you're interested in teh discussions 
about the proposed changes.

Another problem might be web devlopers, who explicitly check for safari 
instead of render engin KHTML, so excluding Konqueror despite it being able 
to render the site.

Cheers,
Kevin

-- 
Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer at gmx.at>
Qt/KDE Developer, Debian User
www.mrunix.de - Unix/Linux programming forum
www.qtforum.org - Qt programming forum
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20040602/76fc7821/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.