Spammers harvesting addresses from the KDE bug-tracking DB.

[enine]

I got one also.  Can't see the headers in my webmail but here is the lookup from the IP in yours

Search results for: 217.132.16.9 


OrgName:    RIPE Network Coordination Centre
OrgID:      RIPE
Address:    Singel 258
Address:    1016 AB
City:       Amsterdam
StateProv:
PostalCode:
Country:    NL

ReferralServer: whois://whois.ripe.net

NetRange:   217.0.0.0 - 217.255.255.255
CIDR:       217.0.0.0/8
NetName:    217-RIPE
NetHandle:  NET-217-0-0-0-1
Parent:
NetType:    Allocated to RIPE NCC
NameServer: NS.RIPE.NET
NameServer: NS3.NIC.FR
NameServer: SUNIC.SUNET.SE
NameServer: AUTH00.NS.UU.NET
NameServer: SEC1.APNIC.NET
NameServer: SEC3.APNIC.NET
NameServer: TINNIE.ARIN.NET
Comment:    These addresses have been further assigned to users in
Comment:    the RIPE NCC region. Contact information can be found in
Comment:    the RIPE database at http://www.ripe.net/whois
RegDate:    2000-06-05
Updated:    2003-09-19

OrgTechHandle: RIPE-NCC-ARIN
OrgTechName:   RIPE NCC Hostmaster
OrgTechPhone:  +31 20 535 4444
OrgTechEmail:  search-ripe-ncc-not-arin at ripe.net

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2004-02-12 19:15
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database
 


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Malcolm Ferguson <malc_kde_mailing_list at erin-and-malc.ca>
Reply-To: kde at mail.kde.org
Date:  Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:31:27 -0500

>This morning I received spam to an address that I've only ever used in 
>conjunction with the KDE bug tracking database.  In fact I only used it 
>on one occasion to submit a minor compilation issue.  I'm not sure if 
>this list is the right place to bring up this topic, but I would 
>appreciate being pointed in the right direction.  Also, let it serve as 
>warning or reminder to anybody here that they should seriously consider 
>using unique throw-away email aliases/addresses.  For now I've disabled 
>the alias that received the spam so any usage in the future will 
>bounce.  This is a bit of pain though as I don't want to have to keep 
>re-registered with the bug tracking DB.
>
>Headers from the offending message:
>
>>From - Fri Feb 13 10:41:28 2004
>X-UIDL: &>b"!ZW4!!>AR!!f:m!!
>X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
>X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
>Return-path: <gogadget at netvision.net.il>
>Envelope-to: malc_bugs_kde_org at erin-and-malc.ca
>Received: from [217.132.16.9] (helo=Jenny)
>	by wolverine.erin-and-malc.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
>	id 1Arbk0-0004Bd-00
>	for <malc_bugs_kde_org at erin-and-malc.ca>; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:44:17 -0500
>Received: from  [127.0.0.1] by Jenny
>  (ArGoSoft Mail Server Pro for WinNT/2000/XP, Version 1.8 (1.8.4.5)); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:45:29 
>Reply-To: "Online Store" <sygnet at sygnet-tech.com>
>From: "Online Store" <gogadget at netvision.net.il>
>To: <malc_bugs_kde_org at erin-and-malc.ca>
>Subject: The #1 Bluetooth Headset for Mobile Phones
>Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:45:27 +0200
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C3CEF9.90DC96A0"
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
>Message-ID: <2bkcr7mjckldk4m.130220041345 at Jenny>
>X-UIDL: &>b"!ZW4!!>AR!!f:m!!
>Status: U
>
>
>
>T
>
>
>
>___________________________________________________
>This message is from the kde mailing list.
>Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
>Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
>More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
>
 

 
________________________________________________________________
Sent via the HostPortal WebMail system at ninefamily.com


 
                   
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.