question about dcop
Kevin Krammer
kevin.krammer at gmx.at
Mon Oct 13 22:36:31 BST 2003
On Monday 13 October 2003 21:52, Sohail Somani wrote:
> Is one forced to revert to commandline dcop? I compare similar
> component models such as COM. You can programmatically control
> applications. I am wondering if dcop has some similar mechanism.
The ommandline dcop utility is just a frontend for shell scripts.
Programming languages like C++, C, Python, Perl, etc, have their own DCOP
bridges for far more advanced stuff.
And DCOP is not a component model, it is more a scripting interface.
KParts is a component model.
Cheers,
Kevin
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer at gmx.at>
Developer at the Kmud Project http://www.kmud.de/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20031013/1ec71ce6/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
More information about the kde
mailing list