Why KDE?

[Gerhard den Hollander]

* Jannik Lindquist <janniklindquist at moseand.com> (Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 09:38:59AM +0200)

> I am new to Linux and puzzled by the fact that there are no less than
> two different ambitious desktops avaliable. If I have understood
> correctly, GNOME is the oldest of the two projects. Why was KDE created
> when GNOME was already there? After all one of KDE's core tenets is:

> * Use available tools rather than reinventing existing ones!

Choice is good ;)

Why start Gnome (or KDE0 when we already had Enlightment  ?

Why start Enlightment when we already had fvwm ?

Why start fvwm why we already had twm ?

Why start X when yoou have a commandline ;) ...

&c &c &c ....


Currently listening to:  - 

	Gerhard,  <@jasongeo.com>   == The Acoustic Motorbiker == 	
-- 
   __O	If your watch is wound, wound to run, it will
 =`\<,	If your time is due, due to come, it will
(=)/(=)	Living this life, is like trying to learn latin
		in a chines firedrill

___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.