Why KDE?
Gerhard den Hollander
gerhard at jason.nl
Fri Jun 14 07:56:58 BST 2002
* Jannik Lindquist <janniklindquist at moseand.com> (Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 09:38:59AM +0200)
> I am new to Linux and puzzled by the fact that there are no less than
> two different ambitious desktops avaliable. If I have understood
> correctly, GNOME is the oldest of the two projects. Why was KDE created
> when GNOME was already there? After all one of KDE's core tenets is:
> * Use available tools rather than reinventing existing ones!
Choice is good ;)
Why start Gnome (or KDE0 when we already had Enlightment ?
Why start Enlightment when we already had fvwm ?
Why start fvwm why we already had twm ?
Why start X when yoou have a commandline ;) ...
&c &c &c ....
Currently listening to: -
Gerhard, <@jasongeo.com> == The Acoustic Motorbiker ==
--
__O If your watch is wound, wound to run, it will
=`\<, If your time is due, due to come, it will
(=)/(=) Living this life, is like trying to learn latin
in a chines firedrill
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
More information about the kde
mailing list