kde-www Digest, Vol 249, Issue 1

[Joseph P. De Veaugh-Geiss]

Hi, is it ok to request keeping the primary discussion at the Invent 
issue? Or I am being too pushy? I find having some replies here and some 
there to be fracturing the discussion. Of course you can inform the 
mailing list of any responses (as I do below).

On 12/1/23 13:00, kde-www-request at kde.org wrote:
> I agree with Paul here. There are technical and social problems with
> dot.kde.org which have gone unresolved and there are no clear plans to
> resolve them nor anyone apparently willing th do the worl. The situation
> reminds me a lot of the old KDE forum: we had a lot of hesitation and
> trepidation about replacing it from those who weren't involved with
> either one, but eventually we did the swith-over, and the response was
> instantly positive.
> 
> +1 for chasing the future rather than the past here too.
> 

I think it really depends on what is meant by "chasing the future".

Here is my respons to what I think are potential issues with a social 
media-only approach:

https://invent.kde.org/websites/kde-org/-/issues/25#note_814560

Cheers,
Joseph

> Nate

-- 
Joseph P. De Veaugh-Geiss
KDE Internal Communications & KDE Eco Community Manager
OpenPGP: 8FC5 4178 DC44 AD55 08E7 DF57 453E 5746 59A6 C06F
Matrix: @joseph:kde.org

Generally available Monday-Thursday from 10-16h CET/CEST. Outside of 
these times it may take a little longer for me to respond.

KDE Eco: Building Energy-Efficient Free Software!
Website: https://eco.kde.org
Mastodon: @be4foss at floss.social