A craft mailinglist? Was: [Craft] [Bug 457185] Craft digiKam MacOS : libgphoto2 packaging problem.

Gilles Caulier caulier.gilles at gmail.com
Thu Jul 28 06:41:02 BST 2022


Hi Thomas,

I agree to have a dedicated mailing for Craft. If the community wants
to raise this framework, we need more communication channels.

Even if I consider the mailing list is not safe in time to host
feedback/question/tip/guidance to use and develop this framework, it's
at least the minimum to provide to users.

My experience with digiKam since 2001 is, to use exclusively bugzilla
with developers, or now, gitlab infrastructure, as all traces can be
found easily. For example, in digiKam we have grained all topics very
precisely to be sure to host topics at the right place. Users can
quickly find a subject with a history, this reduces the redundant
questions, noise, and saves time especially when the team is small.
This is why i post my problem to bugzilla, for the moment, as:

- digiKam already compiles with the hand maid CI/CD infrastructure
(not with Craft).
- digiKam is packaged with all options available. It's not the case so
far with Craft.
- Using Craft instead of the current hand maid CI/CD is a big regression.

But as we cannot sign (in fact to pay) the bundles with the hand maid
infrastructure and as we want to publish the bundle on the stores
(especially MacOS and Windows), we decide to switch progressively to
Craft. It's not a simple task but we have a long experience in
packaging as digiKam has been bundled since 2015 with the hand maid
solution.

Voilà, it's my small feedback to this thread.

My best regards

Gilles Caulier

Le mer. 27 juil. 2022 à 21:05, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
<thomas.friedrichsmeier at kdemail.net> a écrit :
>
> Am Wed, 27 Jul 2022 06:49:18 +0000
> schrieb "Hannah von Reth" <bugzilla_noreply at kde.org>:
>
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457185
>
> [...]
>
> > Btw,
> > This is the craft bug tracker, not stackoverflow or a mailing list.
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Hannah
>
> I'll take this as an opportunity to mention that I have often thought
> craft may need a dedicated mailing list? It has long since out-grown
> its Windows-only days. Posting to kde-windows really does feel a bit
> misplaced when discussing problems with AppImages or APKs. Also, at
> times I have some unfinished thoughts on craft itself that are too
> involved for chat, but also don't quite translate into issues or merge
> requests. Last not least, where, other than chat, would (usage)
> problems with binary-factory infrastructure be discussed?
>
> Does anybody else see a need for this? And maybe calling it something
> like "kde-build" would even encourage more synergy with kde-buildsrc?
>
> Regards
> Thomas


More information about the Kde-windows mailing list