Problem with BinryPackageBase
Patrick Spendrin
ps_ml at gmx.de
Sun Feb 28 16:46:46 CET 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Habacker schrieb:
> Christian Ehrlicher schrieb:
>> Ralf Habacker schrieb:
>>
>>>> When that's the way to go I'll maybe can move some more
>>>> win32libs-sources to the new buildsystem classes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> you are probably refering to win32libs-bin.
>>>
>>>
>> no, sources :)
>>
> I see - the win32libs-sources dir contains packages which are compiled
> from source and packages which are only repackaged. win32libs-bin
> contains refers to binary packages which are already repackaged
>
> Would it not make sense to separate the real source packages from the
> repackaged packages ?
No, I think in the long run, we might end up building everything from
source anyway, So this status would change then without a real need.
What might be more interesting is to split the package according to
their language (C/C++). What do you think?
>
> Ralf
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-windows mailing list
> Kde-windows at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-windows
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (MingW32)
iEYEARECAAYFAkuKj+YACgkQi49rfdk/G3ZkdwCfQ9ifH4uU1QOFO/dCSZGZlW6d
FIAAnRy88Kxnq6QXkqT1ZtM2y0FB00ge
=3c95
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Kde-windows
mailing list