Windows registry utils in kdesupport/win32

Christian Ehrlicher Ch.Ehrlicher at gmx.de
Thu Mar 27 14:06:18 CET 2008


> Von: "Jarosław Staniek"
> Jarosław Staniek said the following, On 2008-03-27 13:55:
> > Christian Ehrlicher said the following, On 2008-03-27 10:18:
> >>> Von: "Jarosław Staniek"
> >>> Christian Ehrlicher said the following, On 2008-03-27 06:29:
> >>>> Jarosław Staniek schrieb:
> >>>>> Christian Ehrlicher said the following, On 2008-03-26 20:29:
> >>>>>> Jarosław Staniek schrieb:
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>> Forgot to say that before but contents of 
> >>>>>>> kdecore/kernel/kernel_win.cpp is my code, which was originally in 
> >>>>>>> kdelibs/win/win32_utils2.cpp (KDE3).
> >>>>>>> But more important is what I propose - move it to kdesupport
> because 
> >>>>>>> we'll be accessing more and more windows registry in the future.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> much better - remove it completly and replace it by QSettings :-)
> >>>>>> http://doc.trolltech.com/4.3/qsettings.html#platform-specific-notes
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Well, good idea (that's new in Qt4); so we'd have only things like 
> >>>>> showWin32FilePropertyDialog() in kdesupport.
> >>>>>
> >>>> So what do you want to move to kdesupport (and where?). Just this
> single
> >>>> Function?
> >>> Remove getWin32RegistryValue registry function, we'll probably also
> have
> >>> more 
> >>> functions like getWin32ShellFoldersPath() in kdesupport.
> >>>
> >> As long as you only have two functions I don't see a need for an
> additional library in kdesupport.
> > 
> > We're talking about kdewin32 lib.
> 
> Hm ok but then we wouldnt have access to Qt...
> So I am saying in kdecore (possibly with a namespace).
> 
That was the point why I moved out all the c++ stuff from kdewin32 - we shouldn't have a qt dependency in kdewin32 lib :)

Christian
-- 
Psst! Geheimtipp: Online Games kostenlos spielen bei den GMX Free Games! 
http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/free


More information about the Kde-windows mailing list