dbus errors

Jeff Mitchell kde-dev at emailgoeshere.com
Sat Apr 12 14:35:10 CEST 2008


Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
>>>> Unfortunately, it doesn't produce anything.  It just shifts the errors 
>>>> down by one line...no warnings about previous definitions of interface 
>>>> are given.
>>>>
>>>> However, doing:
>>>> #undef interface
>>>>
>>>> Makes compile work again.
>>>>
>>>> How do I solve this?  It's probably a result of including some of the 
>>>> various Microsoft files I needed to include in order to get WMI 
>>>> methods written.  But I don't really want to #undef things that are 
>>>> supposed to be defined willy-nilly, nor can I expect that "patch Qt" 
>>>> is a reasonable answer  :-)
>> You could also remove "interface" in the Qt header or rename it, the
>> name isn't important in the header:
>>
>> static QDBusMessage createSignal(const QString &path, const QString
>> &interface_this_name_is_totally_arbitrary, const QString &name);
>>
>> Then we could try to post a patch to Trolltech not to use "interface"
>> as name for variables in declaration.
> 
> Thiago, is there a snowball's chance in hell of this happening?
> (especially in 4.4?)  I'm including some standard include headers in my
> files on Windows to query WMI for hardware information.  I'm still 
> trying to pinpoint the exact MS include file that is causing 
> this...there are several that #define interface, but so far none that 
> appear in my includes list...but I haven't been able to check the normal 
> VC includes yet (i.e. I don't *think* that any of the Win2K3 SDK ones 
> are defining it).

Testing this, I forgot that there's a method named interface()...it 
doesn't only appear in unimportant places.  Which means that to change 
it would be to break API...not going to happen.  Not sure if an "#undef 
interface" might be possible...

--Jeff


More information about the Kde-windows mailing list