dbus errors
Jeff Mitchell
kde-dev at emailgoeshere.com
Sat Apr 12 14:35:10 CEST 2008
Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
>>>> Unfortunately, it doesn't produce anything. It just shifts the errors
>>>> down by one line...no warnings about previous definitions of interface
>>>> are given.
>>>>
>>>> However, doing:
>>>> #undef interface
>>>>
>>>> Makes compile work again.
>>>>
>>>> How do I solve this? It's probably a result of including some of the
>>>> various Microsoft files I needed to include in order to get WMI
>>>> methods written. But I don't really want to #undef things that are
>>>> supposed to be defined willy-nilly, nor can I expect that "patch Qt"
>>>> is a reasonable answer :-)
>> You could also remove "interface" in the Qt header or rename it, the
>> name isn't important in the header:
>>
>> static QDBusMessage createSignal(const QString &path, const QString
>> &interface_this_name_is_totally_arbitrary, const QString &name);
>>
>> Then we could try to post a patch to Trolltech not to use "interface"
>> as name for variables in declaration.
>
> Thiago, is there a snowball's chance in hell of this happening?
> (especially in 4.4?) I'm including some standard include headers in my
> files on Windows to query WMI for hardware information. I'm still
> trying to pinpoint the exact MS include file that is causing
> this...there are several that #define interface, but so far none that
> appear in my includes list...but I haven't been able to check the normal
> VC includes yet (i.e. I don't *think* that any of the Win2K3 SDK ones
> are defining it).
Testing this, I forgot that there's a method named interface()...it
doesn't only appear in unimportant places. Which means that to change
it would be to break API...not going to happen. Not sure if an "#undef
interface" might be possible...
--Jeff
More information about the Kde-windows
mailing list