useless discussion on MinGW/MSVC & releasing apps

Saro Engels ps_ml at gmx.de
Fri Dec 21 12:00:28 CET 2007


Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
> On 21.12.07 11:34:13, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
>> I wonder why we need such a dicussion every now and then. Imho we
>> decided to support both compilers - so no discussion here any more.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
>> The only thing you could discuss is wheter we should (officially)
>> support gcc4.2.1 and msvc2008. As gcc4.2.1 is only a technology preview
>> I personally would not even consider them using it in anything other
>> than a test environment...
> 
> Well, for now thats probably Ok, but I hope we can switch to gcc4.2 or
> even 4.3 for the first release already.
> 
>> I also don't understand why someone thinks about releasing any kde4 app
>> before 4.1. There're so much open issues in kdelibs and I did not see a
>> *single* checkin to fix them! Looks like you only want to get some
>> public attention without thinking about what you want to release.
> 
> Do we have a list of all these issues? I suspect I can find out some
> things by simply building and trying a kde app, but having them written
> down might be a good thing.
> 
> Maybe we should ask for a bugzilla component for kde-win specific issues
There is 
http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/KDE_on_Windows/Missing/features/functions/kdelibs
already which is not to much yet. If you find something, please add it 
below.

SE



More information about the Kde-windows mailing list