D10186: Added a feautre to execute the next task after the previous one finishes.

Albert Astals Cid noreply at phabricator.kde.org
Fri Feb 2 22:35:57 UTC 2018


aacid added a comment.


  In https://phabricator.kde.org/D10186#199439, @fmiroslaw wrote:
  
  > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D10186#199343, @aacid wrote:
  >
  > > The text could be much better, at least should be "task" and not "tasks" since it applies to a single task.
  > >
  > > Also what happens if a task is in loop and the next one is a "consecutive ? and more importantly, what do we think should happen?
  >
  >
  > Hmm in the actual summary I don't see any "tasks", I assume you've modified it. Well, then the task should not be executed until the user puts the previous one out of the loop. I'll come up with an alternative whatsthis and tooltip texts. Additionally, shouldn't loop and one instance checkboxes be mutually exclusive?? Because they are not, which, by common sense, isn't right.
  
  
  Sorry i didn't mean in the summary, i mean on the actual user interface. I
  
  In https://phabricator.kde.org/D10186#199439, @fmiroslaw wrote:
  
  > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D10186#199343, @aacid wrote:
  >
  > > The text could be much better, at least should be "task" and not "tasks" since it applies to a single task.
  > >
  > > Also what happens if a task is in loop and the next one is a "consecutive ? and more importantly, what do we think should happen?
  >
  >
  > Hmm in the actual summary I don't see any "tasks",
  
  
  I mean here <string>Consecutive tasks</string>

REPOSITORY
  R361 KTimer

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D10186

To: fmiroslaw, #kde_applications
Cc: aacid, bcooksley, kde-utils-devel, alexeymin, genaxxx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-utils-devel/attachments/20180202/7250c96d/attachment.html>


More information about the Kde-utils-devel mailing list