Tagging
David Edmundson
david at davidedmundson.co.uk
Sat Jan 21 12:51:31 UTC 2012
2012/1/20 Martin Klapetek <martin.klapetek at gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 17:28, George Kiagiadakis
> <kiagiadakis.george at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> I'll do the tarballs on Sunday. Please don't tag or create branches
>> until then. My scripts will do that, after ensuring that everything is
>> ok for release. Fix any last things in master and keep new features in
>> your personal repos for a few more days.
>> 7
>> Regarding branches, I don't think it's worth creating them. If we need
>> branches after that for doing 0.3.x releases, we can create them later
>> from the 0.3 tag.
>
>
> ++
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> George
>>
>>
>> PS: I would appreciate it though if someone bumped the version strings
>> in the source code. Bump to 0.3.0 for now and we can bump to 0.3.60 or
>> whatever after the tagging.
>
>
> Ok, I'll take care of this.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 18:29, David
> Edmundson <david at davidedmundson.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > but should we follow the plan "0.4 with nepomuk no matter what"
>>
>> Is this a question?
>>
>> I have so much coming for 0.4 already, Fernando's new Plasmoid chats,
>> a log viewer, we can get this contact list plasmoid...
>>
>> If we have tonnes of stuff that makes it worthy of a release we should
>> make a release. If that includes your nepomuk stuff, great, if not I
>> don't think any one person's goals (for anyone, myself included)
>> should define the whole release date.
>
>
> Well, I hate it's being just me working on that. And to be honest after the
> latest KDE "discussion", I'm really demotivated to continue this. Nobody
> seems to care. Not even our team. So...I just don't know.
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 18:45, Alin M Elena <alinm.elena at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> what about video?
>
>
> If someone manages to write a Qt port of Call1 (still unstable spec), get it
> merged in tp-qt, then write a KTp lib and then a cool UI until the next
> release date/feature freeze date, then why not.
>
Or we just do what empathy does.
ship the Call1 spec with our ktp-call-ui and compile the low level
bindings there. The logger-qt does that with the draft logger spec and
it really doesn't look difficult, just copy and paste of some scripts
and XML.
It gets a bit more complex with the call ui because I don't know how
farsight fits into all this.
> --
> Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
>
> _______________________________________________
> KDE-Telepathy mailing list
> KDE-Telepathy at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-telepathy
>
More information about the KDE-Telepathy
mailing list