Use of CLOSED in Bugzilla (was) Re: [Bug 284853] ...

[Aleix Pol]

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Adrián Chaves Fernández
<adriyetichaves at gmail.com> wrote:
> I still think a person other than the author of the bug should verify it
> before the bug is closed. It does not need to be the reporter, it can be a
> fellow developer. It’s the most basic QA there is.
>
> But yes, of course, you can just resolve and leave it up to whoever finds out
> it is not actually fixed to reopen it, the same you would do for a regression.

Well, it happens. If it's not actually FIXED, then the fellow
developers or yourself should reopen the bug.

Requiring to act when everything is like it should be is what makes
those systems too boring to be useful. It's more interesting to worry
about bugs when they are a problem.

Aleix