Use of CLOSED in Bugzilla (was) Re: [Bug 284853] ...

[Adrián Chaves Fernández]

I think in projects with no QA team, the reporter can be the QA:
- Reporter opens.
- Developer resolves.
- Reporter confirms (closes).

O Luns, 27 de Agosto de 2012 23:35:20 Martin Klapetek escribiu:

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:26 PM, David Edmundson <david at davidedmundson.co.uk> 
wrote:

Can we continue this discussion off-bugzilla and onto our mailing
list. It's quite interesting, but not really related to that
bug-report.

CC-ing the KDE-Telepathy (where this started), and KDE-Quality mailing
list (where this discussion should be)

Backstory for those new:
 - there was a comment "is this bug closed" on a bug that was marked
as resolved. In KTp we're currently treating those two states as the
same thing.

>Well, I meant CLOSED as opposed to RESOLVED. I guess you are not using CLOSED
(yet?) either.

As I understand it in bugzilla terms, resolved is the development team
saying it's fixed. Closed is used when a QA team has accepted the
patch.

Is this correct?

Given manpower/resources, I was under the (wrong?)  impression that in
KDE we simply go to resolved and closed was in reality
unused/pointless. Certainly with my developer hat on, it seems it.

1) How _should_ we be using "closed" as opposed to "resolved" in an ideal 
world?



Also note that bugzilla doesn't allow setting CLOSED directly, it needs to be 
RESOLVED and only then can it be CLOSED. Which for our project (KDE 
Telepathy), which has no real QA (assuming the usage example above holds), 
causes unnecessary overhead, needing to "close" the bug twice, which in turn 
leads to creating (useless) email noise. In other words - I see no benefit of 
CLOSED in small projects like ours. 


-- 
Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-telepathy/attachments/20120827/6173a5de/attachment.html>