inconsistent-file-naming-convention.cpp

[Olli Salli]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03.03.2011 21:05, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 06:09 PM, David Edmundson wrote:
>> There are two votes in favour of thisstylehere.cpp (Daniele and Oggis)
>> Two votes for this-style-here.cpp (Florian and George G)
> 
> My vote was in favour of thisstylehere.cpp because reading Oggis post I
> understood that there is a kde convention.
> If there is no convention isn't my vote is void! ;)

Ditto. I based my assumption about an existing KDE convention on the
earlier mails as well :)

That said, should the names really be sunshine/sunshineaccountplugin.cpp
etc, but rather sunshine/accountplugin.cpp if one went that route? It
would surely help some. Or is there a convention here saying the
namespace should be duplicated (in the path and in the basename)? Note
that e.g. in tp-qt4 we use TelepathyQt4/pending-operation.cpp, etc, as
in the dashed-name is based on just the local class name, not the namespace.

Br,
Olli Salli
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNcMAKAAoJEAQQkupGanj4r2QIAJfRJQDpMlTNjZLdAFhILwxN
FuGdmuja1F6+GhDRGsN5TMp+FYiVl3cyykKHXVdSPLDlNWyaXgpwgQcXiB6LSlfa
BZxNH58hWTwtK0g5pK+fb1Zrp2rRw8B0pnbTBYAklR535WA5iPPTwxEUrBiYXTKH
oMDCPEVEB5AH8Ds2Oz1pCF/RfdleqeOVP7R6s8D4iWsEvqAEeZUkm1hVafwACZyk
M9hlvETtimmbke1BX0JibpItGMHlZYdRJd2SzIZmvHXyLcE7JiO5PPLkXP41wEy7
kDjQqkREND69/HHDjPW7a7eAV3XS/7ghz6GONgfnsh1AbdcBlimkMRSmk9jrusA=
=ZgAM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----