Review Request: Create an option for the behaviour of new tabs

David Edmundson kde at davidedmundson.co.uk
Wed Jul 13 14:56:22 CEST 2011



> On July 13, 2011, 12:52 p.m., Francesco Nwokeka wrote:
> > config/behavior-config.h, line 36
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101886/diff/2/?file=26781#file26781line36>
> >
> >     QWodget *parent = 0 -> cooler. keep the * next to the var name

Source: http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Kdelibs_Coding_Style#Whitespace


> On July 13, 2011, 12:52 p.m., Francesco Nwokeka wrote:
> > config/behavior-config.cpp, line 75
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101886/diff/2/?file=26782#file26782line75>
> >
> >     what's this for? if you don't have to output anything don't put the debug there. I find it useless

@nwoki: FYI people do it because kDebug() will print out the method name at the start of the print, so it will output something.


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101886/#review4679
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 12, 2011, 3:02 p.m., Lasath Fernando wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101886/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 12, 2011, 3:02 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Telepathy.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This was rather a big refractor (for me at least), and this is the first time I created any new classes. So I'm not sure I did quite a few things right.
> 
> I created a new tab in the KCM, called Behaviour. I think we'll probably have to change the labels on the radiobuttons to something that makes more sense. 
> 
> I also included "../app/telepathy-chat-ui.h" because I needed an enum from it. I don't know if there's anything against doing that or not.
> 
> I also am not sure I used a QButtonGroup correctly. 
> 
> Also, I noticed the other class didn't use a d-pointer, (even though a KCM is supposed to be like a library file) so I didn't. 
> 
> There are many more things I was doubtful at the time, but I can't possibly remember now (I shouldn't leave writing review requests till 2AM). Hopefully, everything makes sense in the diff.
> 
> And as always, my code is in my scratch repo:
> http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=clones%2Ftelepathy-chat-handler%2Ffernando%2FdetachableTabs.git&a=shortlog&h=refs/heads/refractored_tabs
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   app/telepathy-chat-ui.h f3cab67 
>   app/telepathy-chat-ui.cpp fe0fb9b 
>   config/CMakeLists.txt 48252a7 
>   config/appearance-config.h PRE-CREATION 
>   config/appearance-config.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   config/behavior-config.h PRE-CREATION 
>   config/behavior-config.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   config/behaviorconfig.ui PRE-CREATION 
>   config/main-window.h e95bf93 
>   config/main-window.cpp 3a79da4 
>   config/main.cpp c47f493 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101886/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Changed a (well, the only) setting, and the program changed behaviour as expected. 
> 
> 
> Screenshots
> -----------
> 
> 
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101886/s/198/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lasath
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-telepathy/attachments/20110713/2bef18a8/attachment.htm 


More information about the KDE-Telepathy mailing list