[Kde-scm-interest] Kopete git migration

Fri May 31 15:37:22 UTC 2013

Ok, let's check what's the current status:

filesharing, krdc, and now also kdenetwork-strigi-analyzers are 
maintainer approved.

kdnssd and kppp have been shorty checked by me and they look ok (though 
it would be a good idea if somebody else could check also).

kopete: @Pali, is it ready?

the krfb maintainer has not answered yet; probably we should check that 
repo as well.

@Jeremy: Anything that needs to be done before the final conversion?

Bye
urs

On 2013-05-24 21:58, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> Hi Urs,
> 
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Urs Wolfer <uwolfer at kde.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Jeremy
>> 
>> Now it looks like tags got lost?
> 
> Nope, I just forgot to push them, pushing them now.
>  
> 
>> CMakeList.txt history looks good IMHO now.
>> 
>> Also, I think you can drop the branch "make_kget_cool" if you do
>> not have any reason for keeping it. Do you think there is no need
>> for an "orignal" branch because the "make_kget_cool" branch is based
>> (?) on this branch?
> 
> Ok, we can easily delete that branch afterwards, we could make the
> "master" branch before rev 478995 on an "original" branch. I'll look
> into that.  I think the existing make_kget_cool branch that's also
> master works ok and we can just nuke make_kget_cool before pushing
> since it's very old.
> 
> BR
> Jeremy
>  
> 
>> Bye
>> urs
>> 
>> On 2013-05-23 18:46, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
>> 
>>> ok, fixed the rules a bit by adding the work branch
>>> make_kget_cool and
>>> pushed to scratch/whiting/kget.  It looks good except for an old
>>> master branch of doc stuff that didn't get merged in somehow
>>> (something wrong with the rules only I'm
>>> 
>> 
> sure). http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch%2Fwhiting%2Fkget.git&a=history&h=dd40536f1643209d157cba75adc70fe36712e05f&f=CMakeLists.txt
>>> [1]
>>> [3] looks like it includes all history for CMakeLists.txt now.
>>>  I'll
>>> 
>>> look at the master branch with doc stuff in a bit and then we
>>> should
>>> be good to go I believe.
>>> 
>>> BR
>>> Jeremy
>>> 
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Jeremy Whiting
>>> <jpwhiting at kde.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Urs,
>>> 
>>> Hmm, looking at the kget git repo I have here I do have
>>> make_kget_cool branch, but it only goes to rev 407833, also I have
>>> a master branch that ends at one point.  I'll see what I can do
>>> to clean this up and let you know.
>>> 
>>> BR,
>>> Jeremy
>>> 
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Urs Wolfer <uwolfer at kde.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi Jeremy
>>> 
>>> Lukas Appelhans has noticed an issue in KGet:
>>> 
>>> "I'm missing a bit history here. Compare these two:
>>> 
>> 
> http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch%2Fwhiting%2Fkget.git&a=history&h=be2aa17d34ebc12e82a5d9275ed0f597ee41929f&f=CMakeLists.txt&pg=1
>>> [2] [1]
>>> and
>>> 
>> 
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdenetwork/kget/CMakeLists.txt?view=log
>>> [3] [2]
>>> 
>>> The branched commits show fine in websvn (make_kget_cool, at the
>>> end), while in git, your merge commit is the first one. Is that
>>> expected behavior?"
>>> 
>>> Jeremy, I think you could do it like KRDC: make a branch
>>> "original" with all the old commits, and put all commits from the
>>> "make_kget_cool" branch into master. Also you can drop the Git
>>> branch "make_kget_cool".
>>> 
>>> Bye
>>> urs
>>> 
>>> On 2013-05-17 18:19, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Urs Wolfer <uwolfer at kde.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Ok, I have mailed all maintainers. Once we get their approval, we
>>> can start the final migration :)
>>> 
>>> Should I request Git repos for every project from KDE sysadmins?
>>> 
>>> Yes, you can, make sure you ask to add me (whiting) as a Project
>>> Manager so I can push the conversions.
>>> 
>>> Pali, I'm using the modified svn-all-fast-export to match files,
>>> does
>>> my kopete git repo on scratch/whiting/kopete differ from yours?
>>>  If
>>> not it'd probably be simplest for me to just push all the
>>> conversions
>>> from here when we do the final one.
>>> 
>>> BR,
>>> Jeremy
>>>  
>>> 
>>> @Pali: What do you think about Kopete? Is it also ready?
>>> 
>>> Bye
>>> urs
>>> 
>>> On 2013-05-17 17:01, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Urs Wolfer <uwolfer at kde.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jeremy
>>> 
>>> I have had a look at KRDC and it looks really good. I have found
>>> no issues so far.
>>> 
>>> So, what's next? Do you think the scripts are almost ready? If
>>> yes, I think I will notify all maintainers again to check their
>>> converted repos.
>>> 
>>> Yes, I think it's in very good shape.  If you could get
>>> maintainers to
>>> check their repos that would be great.  And update the table in
>>> the
>>> wiki page accordingly.
>>> 
>>> BR,
>>> Jeremy
>>> 
>>> Links:
>>> ------
>>> [1]
>>> 
>> 
> http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch%2Fwhiting%2Fkget.git&a=history&h=be2aa17d34ebc12e82a5d9275ed0f597ee41929f&f=CMakeLists.txt&pg=1
>>> [2]
>>> [2]
>>> 
>> 
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdenetwork/kget/CMakeLists.txt?view=log
>>> [3]
>>> [3]
>>> 
>> 
> http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch%2Fwhiting%2Fkget.git&a=history&h=dd40536f1643209d157cba75adc70fe36712e05f&f=CMakeLists.txt
>>> [1]
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch%2Fwhiting%2Fkget.git&a=history&h=dd40536f1643209d157cba75adc70fe36712e05f&f=CMakeLists.txt
> [2]
> http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch%2Fwhiting%2Fkget.git&a=history&h=be2aa17d34ebc12e82a5d9275ed0f597ee41929f&f=CMakeLists.txt&pg=1
> [3] 
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdenetwork/kget/CMakeLists.txt?view=log