[Kde-scm-interest] Kopete git migration

[Jeremy Whiting]

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Friday 17 May 2013 18:19:24 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Urs Wolfer <uwolfer at kde.org>
> wrote:
> > > Ok, I have mailed all maintainers. Once we get their
> > > approval, we can start the final migration :)
> > >
> > > Should I request Git repos for every project from KDE
> > > sysadmins?
> >
> > Yes, you can, make sure you ask to add me (whiting) as a
> > Project Manager so I can push the conversions.
> >
> > Pali, I'm using the modified svn-all-fast-export to match
> > files, does my kopete git repo on scratch/whiting/kopete
> > differ from yours?  If not it'd probably be simplest for me
> > to just push all the conversions from here when we do the
> > final one.
> >
>
> It differs, you can look at git hashes. It could be because
> svn2git matching files non deterministic.
>
> First change is by commits:
> 4075f57d2f1dff6dfba05185b867dc10ddc270e4 (my)
> 0704ab4990d9e8a09de44930f6442a414a71cd9b (your)
>
> changes are in commit message (specialy path added by svn2git)
> but on those paths depends filter script and parentmap.
>
> I do not know your repository is different or not (it is really
> big with lot of merges) so I cannot ensure that it is OK.
>
> I prefer to create new clean final conversation on dewey when kde
> svn will be locked.
>

K sounds good, I'll let you do the kopete push then, no worries.

>
> > BR,
> > Jeremy
> >
> > > @Pali: What do you think about Kopete? Is it also ready?
> > >
> > > Bye
> > > urs
> > >
> > > On 2013-05-17 17:01, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > >> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Urs Wolfer
> > >> <uwolfer at kde.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Jeremy
> > >>
> > >> I have had a look at KRDC and it looks really good. I have
> > >> found no issues so far.
> > >>
> > >> So, what's next? Do you think the scripts are almost ready?
> > >> If yes, I think I will notify all maintainers again to
> > >> check their converted repos.
> > >>
> > >> Yes, I think it's in very good shape.  If you could get
> > >> maintainers to check their repos that would be great.  And
> > >> update the table in the wiki page accordingly.
> > >>
> > >> BR,
> > >> Jeremy
>
> --
> Pali Rohár
> pali.rohar at gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20130517/2ea234a5/attachment.html>