[Kde-scm-interest] Kopete git migration

[Pali Rohár]

On Friday 17 May 2013 17:40:12 Urs Wolfer wrote:
> On 2013-05-17 17:30, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 17 May 2013 17:22:24 Urs Wolfer wrote:
> > Ok, I have mailed all maintainers. Once we get their
> > approval, we can start the final migration :)
> > 
> > Should I request Git repos for every project from KDE
> > sysadmins?
> > 
> > @Pali: What do you think about Kopete? Is it also ready?
> > 
> > 
> > Yes, now Kopete is ready. I fixed all problems and now all
> > tags are annotated. All kopete plugins which do not have
> > common history with kopete master was moved into separate
> > rule files and will be in separate git repositories.
> 
> Sounds good. You could probably write to kopete mailing list
> to let other developers also check the migration if you
> haven't done so.
> 

Done.

> > There could be one problem: Only on dewey server is
> > conversion OK due to non deterministic behaviour of svn2git
> > on files...
> > 
> > So for converting kopete please use dewey where conversion
> > working without problem.
> > 
> > Btw, maybe we need to backport "doc" user folder from trunk
> > to KDE/4.10 branch. After that it is needed to fix kopete
> > rules and postprocessing script. If you will do that let me
> > know and I will fix conversion...
> 
> I will cherry-pick my standalone-build and doc-fixes commits
> once the conversion has been done. That should be quite easy.
> 

Right, this is better.

> Bye
> urs
> 
> > Bye
> > urs
> > 
> > On 2013-05-17 17:01, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Urs Wolfer
> > > <uwolfer at kde.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi Jeremy
> > > 
> > > I have had a look at KRDC and it looks really good. I have
> > > found no issues so far.
> > > 
> > > So, what's next? Do you think the scripts are almost
> > > ready? If yes, I think I will notify all maintainers
> > > again to check their converted repos.
> > > 
> > > Yes, I think it's in very good shape.  If you could get
> > > maintainers to check their repos that would be great.  And
> > > update the table in the wiki page accordingly.
> > > 
> > > BR,
> > > Jeremy

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20130517/9283ccca/attachment.sig>