[Kde-scm-interest] kdenetwork Git migration

Thu Jun 6 20:44:18 UTC 2013

El Dijous, 6 de juny de 2013, a les 22:26:17, Pali Rohár va escriure:
> Hello,
> 
> all kopete repos were pushed to git.kde.org. I also enabled hooks
> and development sites and configured trunk i18n branch.
> 
> When you delete kdenetwork from svn, can you delete also
> playground and extragear kopete paths from svn? These are
> converted in git too.
> 
> svn paths:
> /trunk/playground/network/kopete/
> /trunk/extragear/network/kopete-cryptography/
> /trunk/extragear/network/kopete-scripting/
> 
> new git projects:
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdenetwork/kopete
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/network/kopete-pimpresence
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/network/kopete-scripting
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/network/kopete-sharemydesktop
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/network/kopete-thinklight
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/network/kopete-whiteboard
> 
> Plugins cryptography, smpppdcs, motionautoaway and javascript
> are in main kopete repository.

So main kopete gained a few plugins? Hope not in the KDE/4.10 branch, right?

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> On Thursday 06 June 2013 09:33:53 Urs Wolfer wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy
> > 
> > Looks good, thanks a lot! :)
> > 
> > I have cherry-picked all standalone fixes into 4.10 branch.
> > Everything should build now in master and 4.10 (except
> > Kopete, which is not online yet).
> > 
> > I have also update documentation_paths and get_paths in trunk
> > and branch locally; I will commit these change once Kopete is
> > also online.
> > 
> > SVN is looked now, so we do not need to hurry with removing
> > it. I can do that in some days.
> > 
> > Bye
> > urs
> > 
> > On 2013-06-05 23:37, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > > Urs,
> > > 
> > > Ok, kdenetwork-filesharing, kdenetwork-strigi-analyzers,
> > > kdnssd, kget, kppp, krdc and krfb pushed, tags pushed,
> > > hooks enabled, i18n branches set in projects.kde.org [1]
> > > settings, and they are enabled for development.
> > > After kopete is migrated, will you replace the svn content
> > > with a README file as that sysadmin mail said? rather than
> > > me putting one in each app's folder.
> > > 
> > > BR,
> > > 
> > >  Jeremy
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Pali Rohár
> > > <pali.rohar at gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > >> Kopete git conversion scripts on dewey started.
> > >> 
> > >> On Wednesday 05 June 2013 21:10:10 Urs Wolfer wrote:
> > >>> Jeremy, I think you can push into the main repos. The kppp
> > >>> thing looks like some SVN keyword. I think this change
> > >>> doesn't hurt.
> > >>> 
> > >>> Once you pushed into the main repos, you can can notify me
> > >>> again. Then I will test also and cherry-pick the build
> > >>> fixes into the 4.10 branch.
> > >>> 
> > >>> @Pali: You can run the conversion for Kopete now also.
> > >>> 
> > >>> @all: Please do not commit anything which is not related
> > >>> to the conversion at this time!
> > >>> 
> > >>> I have opened a sysadmin ticket for looking SVN repos
> > >>> until Git repos on projects.kde.org [1] look okay and we
> > >>> can remove them in SVN.
> > >>> 
> > >>> Bye
> > >>> urs
> > >>> 
> > >>> On 2013-06-05 18:58, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > >>> > Hmm, actually looking deeper kcm_krfb in svn is an empty
> > >>> > folder (not sure what it's for...)
> > >>> > 
> > >>> > And the differences in kppp seem
> > >>> > weird, http://paste.kde.org/759278/ [2] [2] but
> > >>> > shouldn't affect anything from what I can see. so maybe
> > >>> > we're good to go? should I push this into the main git
> > >>> > repos and we can test there? Rerun the conversion if
> > >>> > needed, etc.
> > >>> > 
> > >>> > BR,
> > >>> > Jeremy
> > >>> > 
> > >>> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Jeremy Whiting
> > >>> > <jpwhiting at kde.org>
> > >>> > 
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> >> Urs,
> > >>> >> 
> > >>> >> I just ran a conversion, and cloned the result and
> > >>> >> found two problems.  One is krfb git repo doesn't have
> > >>> >> kcm_krfb folder inside it.  Looking at the
> > >>> >> CMakeLists.txt it's not built anyway, but we need to
> > >>> >> find out why it's not there at all imo.
> > >>> >> 
> > >>> >> The second problem is that kppp has many differences
> > >>> >> between svn master and git master, not sure why, but
> > >>> >> I'll look into it this evening.  We need these to be
> > >>> >> working and right before we remove from svn.
> > >>> >> 
> > >>> >> thanks,
> > >>> >> Jeremy
> > >>> >> 
> > >>> >> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa
> > >>> >> 
> > >>> >> <rakuco at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > >>> >>> Urs Wolfer <uwolfer at kde.org> writes:
> > >>> >>>> kdenetwork will get migrated to Git in the next days
> > >>> >>>> (between
> > >>> >>> 
> > >>> >>> June 5th
> > >>> >>> 
> > >>> >>>> and June 11th). Please do not commit anything into
> > >>> >>>> SVN anymore.
> > >>> >>> 
> > >>> >>> Also,
> > >>> >>> 
> > >>> >>>> please wait with any Git commits until further
> > >>> >>>> notice.
> > >>> >>> 
> > >>> >>> Sorry if I've missed this being discussed somewhere
> > >>> >>> else, but doesn't it
> > >>> >>> make sense to ask the sysadmins to svn lock kdenetwork
> > >>> >>> to prevent people
> > >>> >>> from committing?
> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> >>> Kde-scm-interest mailing list
> > >>> >>> Kde-scm-interest at kde.org
> > >>> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
> > >>> >>> [3]
> > >> 
> > >> [1]
> > >> 
> > >>> > Links:
> > >>> > ------
> > >>> > [1]
> > >>> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
> > >>> > [3] [2] http://paste.kde.org/759278/ [2]
> > >> 
> > >> --
> > >> Pali Rohár
> > >> pali.rohar at gmail.com
> > > 
> > > Links:
> > > ------
> > > [1] http://projects.kde.org
> > > [2] http://paste.kde.org/759278/
> > > [3] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest