[Kde-scm-interest] git workflow draft

[Alexander Neundorf]

On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:00:56 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Friday, August 26, 2011 12:06:26 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > >> Was this decided upon at some point?  I got conflicting stories from
> > >> sysadmin and other developers.  Yesterday after migrating
> > >> kdeaccessibility to git I was asked by a sysadmin to rename the X.Y
> > >> branches to KDE/X.Y  I think concensus and consistency are important
> > >> here.  Was there a decision that the official branches should be named
> > >> X.Y?
> > > 
> > > My vote goes to "KDE/X.Y", it is clearer what it means.
> > 
> > When the frameworks get split out into multiple repos, will they still
> > use branch names KDE/5.0? What will that mean? Or will we come up with
> > another scheme then?
> 
> I think they should, here's my reasoning:

Including the "5" ?
http://vizzzion.org/blog/2011/06/there-is-no-kde5/ ;-)

Alex