[Kde-scm-interest] git workflow draft
neundorf at kde.org
Mon Sep 12 21:03:20 UTC 2011
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:00:56 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Friday, August 26, 2011 12:06:26 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > >> Was this decided upon at some point? I got conflicting stories from
> > >> sysadmin and other developers. Yesterday after migrating
> > >> kdeaccessibility to git I was asked by a sysadmin to rename the X.Y
> > >> branches to KDE/X.Y I think concensus and consistency are important
> > >> here. Was there a decision that the official branches should be named
> > >> X.Y?
> > >
> > > My vote goes to "KDE/X.Y", it is clearer what it means.
> > When the frameworks get split out into multiple repos, will they still
> > use branch names KDE/5.0? What will that mean? Or will we come up with
> > another scheme then?
> I think they should, here's my reasoning:
Including the "5" ?
More information about the Kde-scm-interest