[Kde-scm-interest] Re: Kate App/Part/KWrite => kate.git

[Albert Astals Cid]

A Dissabte, 29 de gener de 2011, Christoph Cullmann va escriure:
> On Sunday 16 January 2011 13:11:47 Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > is it ok to now move that stuff to the kate.git for KDE 4.7?
> > KTextEditor can reside in kdelibs, to keep BC /SC (I will sync it if
> > changes occur).
> > 
> > This would remove:
> > 
> > kdelibs/kate
> > kdesdk/kate
> > kdebase/apps/kwrite
> > 
> > (and I guess the doc/.. stuff for the apps need to move and what-I-don't
> > know i18n scripts + packaging must change)
> > 
> > But the part/application code really should be only in one place.
> > Given that most people work only in kate.git, this will avoid my hassle
> > with syncs, I will only keep syncing /trunk => git, to avoid any losses
> > until this is done, thought.
> 
> As no reaction until now and kdelibs moves git now already, I intend to
> move kate part out of kdelibs and only let it be in kate.git (same for
> kwrite in kdebase and kate in kdesdk).
> 
> I propose the weekend 15.-16. Feb for the move (which more or less would
> only be a delete in git/svn of the old copies).
> 
> I guess this needs coordination to have for example still working i18n (as
> the docbooks would move too and the i18n stuff needs fixing).
> Therefore CC Albert, would that date be ok for you to help me a bit with
> this? Or should I delay and ask on i18n for help?
> 
> With kdelibs now being a git, it really is not that nice for contributors
> of kate part to clone whole kdelibs...

I'm sorry but having an own repo for kate with all the stuff in there is a no 
go from the i18n point of view.

Albert

> 
> Greetings
> Christoph