[Kde-scm-interest] Re: Usage of pull rebasing and merges

[Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.]

In <4D524734.30204 at viscovery.net>, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>In my book, a "nice" history is not when it is a linear string of changes,
>but rather when each commit represents a good (well tested) project state.
>If, after a rebase, you test only the tip commit, but not the N-1 other
>rebased commits, you do not conform to this definition of "nice".

I didn't know j6t was a fan of KDE.  I haven't heard from you since I left the 
git mailing list.

I agree with your definition of a good history, but git does no favors by 
automatically committing merges.  The merge is another state and needs to be 
tested before it is actually committed.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                   ,= ,-_-. =.
bss at iguanasuicide.net                   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy         `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/                    \_/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20110209/4b35928c/attachment.sig