[Kde-scm-interest] Sysadmin advice regarding Monolithic vs Split repositories.

George Goldberg grundleborg at googlemail.com
Thu Sep 9 16:43:36 CEST 2010


On 9 September 2010 14:33, Ian Monroe <ian at monroe.nu> wrote:
> I'm not really sure if I agree with 'module sovereignty' here. :)
>
> But I overall agree with your point of course. We could create a list
> of which repos are to be split (and how they are to be split), and
> then take this to k-c-d. Basically repos which are a collection of
> apps, which might share some well defined libraries but not much else
> (kdemultimedia, kdegames) they should be split. kdelibs shouldn't be
> split. Probably should consult with folks for gray-area cases like
> koffice and kdebase.

Sorry for being a bit pedantic, but just in case there's any room for
misunderstanding...

kdenetwork (I don't know about other modules, but there may be others)
doesn't have any libraries at all within it (unlike the libkdegames
library used in multiple places throughout kdegames). It is simply 5
totally unconnected applications put together in a module.

--
George


More information about the Kde-scm-interest mailing list