[Kde-scm-interest] Sysadmin advice regarding Monolithic vs Split repositories.

Torgny Nyblom kde at nyblom.org
Wed Sep 8 12:59:35 CEST 2010


On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:03:39 -0500
Ian Monroe <ian at monroe.nu> wrote:

[...]
> AFAIK, its impossible to have svn2git rules for a monolithic repo like
> KDE Multimedia with submodules like Dragon Player produce complete
> history. So I think we are misunderstanding each other?

Why? What kind of change cannot svn2git handle?

> It's likely possible to create a complete history (meaning, a separate
> git commit for every SVN commit) for Dragon Player once its treated as
> a separate repo by svn2git. And therefore Torgny Nyblom's concerns
> about splitting making history-completeness worse are misplaced.

Why would this be easier? Use these rules in the above context but with
a prefix if necessary.

/Regards
Torgny


More information about the Kde-scm-interest mailing list