[Kde-scm-interest] Sysadmin advice regarding Monolithic vs Split repositories.

[Niko Sams]

Thanks for this detailed analysis - I also think you choice is the
only way to go.

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 22:50, Stefan Majewsky
<kdemailinglists at bethselamin.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 September 2010 22:03:28 Chani wrote:
>> What I'm concerned about here is plasmoids: even if we go for split
>> repositories for apps (which I agree would make for a much easier and less
>> surprising kdereview workflow), it may be a bit excessive for every little
>> plasmoid to have its own repo.
>> Perhaps for little plasmoids (and other odds and ends that will inevitably
>> crop up) we could move them and leave/copy their history?
>
> It might be beneficial to adopt the monolithic approach here at a small scale.
I would take the same route - why do it differently when it's more or less the
same problem?

Niko