[Kde-scm-interest] Sysadmin advice regarding Monolithic vs Split repositories.

[Christoph Cullmann]

On Tuesday 07 September 2010 21:38:00 Chani wrote:
> On September 7, 2010 11:35:28 Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 September 2010 18:04:40 Tom Albers wrote:
> > > The sysadmin team would like to setup the services real soon now, so we
> > > ask this list to come up with a final decision about the setup. To be
> > > clear: whatever you decide, we will implement it to the best of our
> > > capabilities.
> > 
> > I agree on the general direction, the split approach just makes it much
> > more easy for people working on individual apps to contribute by avoiding
> > to clone everything.
> > 
> > For Kate for example that still would mean to split out the part and
> > ktexteditor interfaces from kdelibs, which is already done in the
> > gitorious kate repo, which bundles part/app/kwrite and ktexteditor
> > interfaces for the part.
> 
> the way I read it, that wasn't part of the sysadmins' proposal; kdelibs was
> to be kept intact.
I never said it was in their proposal to do so.
But if we want to migrate the current kate gitorious repo, that needs to be 
done that way.

Greetings
Christoph