[Kde-scm-interest] Sysadmin advice regarding Monolithic vs Split repositories.
Chani
chanika at gmail.com
Tue Sep 7 21:38:00 CEST 2010
On September 7, 2010 11:35:28 Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 September 2010 18:04:40 Tom Albers wrote:
> > The sysadmin team would like to setup the services real soon now, so we
> > ask this list to come up with a final decision about the setup. To be
> > clear: whatever you decide, we will implement it to the best of our
> > capabilities.
>
> I agree on the general direction, the split approach just makes it much
> more easy for people working on individual apps to contribute by avoiding
> to clone everything.
>
> For Kate for example that still would mean to split out the part and
> ktexteditor interfaces from kdelibs, which is already done in the gitorious
> kate repo, which bundles part/app/kwrite and ktexteditor interfaces for the
> part.
>
the way I read it, that wasn't part of the sysadmins' proposal; kdelibs was to
be kept intact.
More information about the Kde-scm-interest
mailing list