[Kde-scm-interest] Re: Fwd: [Kde-pim] KDEPIM Git Move

[Torgny Nyblom]

On Saturday 06 November 2010 12.50.34 you wrote:
> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> 
> > On Saturday 06 November 2010 09.58.22 Niko Sams wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:49, Torgny Nyblom <kde at nyblom.org> wrote:
> > > > On Friday 05 November 2010 09.00.48 you wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Could you please shortly explain the used repository layout.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm not really sure what you mean?
> > > > 
> > > > kdepim will be split into kdepim and kdepim-runtime modules in
> > > > git.
> > 
> > This
> > 
> > > > is a split that relects reality as those are two modules living
> > 
> > under
> > 
> > > > one directory in SVN.
> > > > 
> > > > kdepimlibs will be kdepimlibs in git as well.
> > > 
> > > Ok, that's whant I wanted to know....
> > > 
> > > Why don't you split kdepim into individual applications?
> > > (as you have already libs and runtime split)
> > 
> > Since there are way to many interdependencies between the different
> > applications/libraries. The only way that the PIM code makes any sence
> > is as a
> > whole.
> 
> It would make sense to split kdepimlibs though.
> 
> They are already fully independent and it would make it more attractive to
> be used by others.
> 
> Pimlibs is considered as a big monolitic library blob, while that is not
> true. Especially in the mobile world it would be good to have a set of
> small separate libraries, and in fact that is what pimlibs is.. It would
> make the individual bits of pimlibs more attractive to use by apps.
> 
> I'ld advise to split pimlibs.

Would that mean each lib on it's own or?

/Regards
Torgny