[Kde-scm-interest] Alternate Git options
Esben Mose Hansen
kde at mosehansen.dk
Wed May 12 15:13:39 CEST 2010
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 21:29:47 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> This all said, we discussed a few alternatives in #kde-git and I was
> asked to put them on this list for discussion:
I know this is probably a stupid question, but since I can't see the answer,
perhaps other can't either. As far as I can see, we need
1. Actual git repositories
2. User access controls
3. Merge requests/reviewboard
4. A bug tracking system
How about the really simple solution of git + ssh + unix groups, and patching
reviewboard to support git, while keeping bugzilla as is? While nowhere near
as fancy, it seems a robust solution with minimal impact and maintenance,
where the only hard part would be the reviewboard patching. There, a simple
solution could be a social control, where non-trivial patches are not pushed
until reviewboarded, but are otherwise pushed in the normal git-push fashion?
If we wanted to be fancy, we could have a sign-off SHA or URI in the commit
message, which could even be required.
Obviously, since this option is not listed it is a no-go for some reason, but
what reason is that?
--
Kind regards, Esben
More information about the Kde-scm-interest
mailing list