[Kde-scm-interest] Alternate Git options
chanika at gmail.com
Wed May 12 07:54:16 CEST 2010
On May 11, 2010 15:49:30 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 04:03 PM, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11. May 2010 21.29.47 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> >> Merge requests:
> >> Nothing but GitHub and Gitorious currently handle merge requests per se,
> >> but Reviewboard's git handling is getting better.
> > pure git based merge requests are essential for KDE growing in my not so
> > humble opinion.
> Define "pure git-based merge requests". GitHub and Gitorious don't do
> anything you can't do in pure git; Gitorious tells you how to check out
> the branch and merge in commits, and GitHub requires little action on
> your part but under the hood just cherry-picks patches over for you
> (which does some ugly things to history, I might add). So I'm not sure
> what you mean by "pure git-based merge requests", as I don't think
> either of these would qualify.
I *think* he meant "not reviewboard".
I'm not sure how you'd do a merge request without gitorious - publish your git
repo somewhere online and email people the url and branch?
personally I'm not too keen on merge requests - reviewboard works fine for
plasma - but amarok seems to be really enjoying them, and I've heard claims
that they get more contributions that way.
This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20100511/d7b1ec5c/attachment.sig
More information about the Kde-scm-interest