[Kde-scm-interest] Project layout on gitorious

ComputerDruid computerdruid at gmail.com
Mon Mar 29 03:16:41 CEST 2010


On Sunday 28 March 2010 20:05:22 Ian Monroe wrote:
> Yea I guess I was. Many projects will want to have multiple
> repositories, or at least the option to have them, in a commons.
> Useful for feature branches or for old historic branches. You start
> sticking all of even just extragear/multimedia into one project and
> that would get messy.
People have said this before, but I'm not sure it makes sense to me. Why 
should a feature branch be in a different repo from mainline? Since repos can 
have multiple branches, having a second repo with a common ancestor seems 
pointless to me.

Your other points make sense though.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20100328/ea7db51c/attachment-0001.sig 


More information about the Kde-scm-interest mailing list