[Kde-scm-interest] [Proposal] Package splitting with thin meta-repos
mpyne at kde.org
Sat Jan 30 03:41:25 CET 2010
On Friday 29 January 2010 20:18:10 Chani wrote:
> > So sorry to come off as some kind of raving lunatic but I'm seriously not
> > sure where all the misunderstanding/freaking-out is coming from regarding
> > kdesvn- build. Is it just too old (and therefore busted)? Do I need to
> > hurry up and change the name before people will believe it handles git
> > modules? Is it because I bothered to try and document it fully? Is it
> > Perl? (then just use Michael Jansen's build tool) Or is this just the
> > next IRC client, and everyone is going to make their own "build them
> > all" script?
> yeah, maybe I *should* try out kdesvnbuild.
> I've just got a bunch of scripts I wrote myself, and they work... plus they
> handle my git-svn repos that are inside some of my svn repos, and they log
> errors in a way I'm used to... and change takes effort. :)
I'm not at all opposed to people using their own scripts, what I don't want is
people putting lots of effort into making solutions for problems that are
already solved, or even worse claiming things about my software that is
untrue. So please don't take any of this to me that I think people should
switch from their own custom scripts, jhbuild, the Ruby build tool or whatever
Instead what I'd like is that when we say that we need some tool that does foo
and bar for the post-conversion period that people quit making up some excuse
or reason that they think kdesvn-build doesn't implement foo and bar. I
understand that people will use software that is familiar to them and I have
no problem with that (not that it would matter what I think anyways) but can I
really be the only one on this list who already successfully uses kdesvn-build
to build KDE from git without issues?
- Michael Pyne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20100129/7657529f/attachment.sig
More information about the Kde-scm-interest