[Kde-scm-interest] [Proposal] Package splitting with thin meta-repos

[Chani]

> 
> So sorry to come off as some kind of raving lunatic but I'm seriously not
> sure where all the misunderstanding/freaking-out is coming from regarding
> kdesvn- build. Is it just too old (and therefore busted)? Do I need to
> hurry up and change the name before people will believe it handles git
> modules? Is it because I bothered to try and document it fully? Is it
> Perl? (then just use Michael Jansen's build tool) Or is this just the next
> IRC client, and everyone is going to make their own "build them all"
> script?
> 

darnit, kmail ate my message.
summary: yeah, I should try it, but change takes effort. :) also my scripts 
handle my gitsvn-within-svn setup for kdelibs/plasma/ n'stuff.

-- 
This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3.
www.chani3.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20100129/523afef2/attachment.sig